Arabpsynet

ÃÈÍÇË ÃÕíáÉ / Original papers

ÔÈßÉ ÇáÚáæã ÇáäÝÓíÉ ÇáÚÑÈíÉ

 

Prevalence of PTSD among Palestinian children in Gaza Strip

Samir Qouta, PhD - Eyad El Sarraj, MD

Gaza Community Mental Health Programme

 

 

q       Full text / Texte  entier 

 

Abstract

    This research study aimed to get acquainted with the prevalence of PTSD, and other psychological suffering among Palestinian children living under severe conditions during the last two and half  years of the Al-Aqsa Intifada. The sample consists of 944 children whom age ranged between 10-19 years. The group excluded those with previous mental health problems. In this research, trauma scale, PTSD scale, the Child Posttraumatic Stress Index, the Children’s PTSD-symptoms, The CPTS-RI and open questions had been used as tools. The results indicated that 32.7% of the children started to develop acute PTSD symptoms that need psychological intervention, while 49.2% of them suffered from moderate level of PTSD symptoms. Also the results showed that the most prevalent types of trauma exposure for children are for those who had witnessed funerals (94.6%), witnessed shooting (83.2%), saw injured or dead who were not relatives (66.9%), and saw family members injured or killed (61.6%).

 

Key words:  PTSD

 

    In September, 2000, a new Palestinian uprising began against the now 36-year old Israeli military occupation. The immediate cause was the visit of then Israeli Knesset Member Ariel Sharon accompanied by over 1000 fully armed Israeli riot police to what Jews call the Temple Mount and Muslims, the Noble Sanctuary (“El-Haram A-Sharif”) on which sits Al-Aqsa Mosque. Palestinians’ protest of the violation of their holy place resulted in Israeli police shooting several unarmed protesters. This event provided the immediate spark for Palestinian protests throughout the West Bank and Gaza Strip, as well as the name for an uprising that continues at this writing, “The Al-Aqsa Intifada.” The more distant cause for this second and more violent Intifada was the evident failure of the Oslo peace process. Instead of a lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians, Oslo agreement has followed by a 50% increase in Israeli settlement building and land confiscation (KUKA), a decrease in Palestinian freedom of movement and lack of civil liberties (KUKA), and economic de-development including high unemployment.

     As the “Al–Aqsa Intifada” continues into its fourth year, the Israeli army frequently shells and destroys the Palestinian homes. Since October 2000 until 31 of January 2004, 3062 homes have been completely and partially demolished and 2524 homes need to be repair in Gaza Strip (UNRWA, 2004). The army uses a variety of methods to destroy homes, including tank shells, bulldozing, helicopter gunship, and fighter aircraft. As homes have been bombarded and made uninhabitable, many Palestinian families have found themselves living in tents.

     When families witness the destruction of their own homes by enemy soldiers, the psychological effects can be serious. Loss of home can be a traumatic experience for not only material loss but for psychological meaning. The home means a shelter and heart of family life. It contains memories of joy and pain as well as attachment to the families’ objects. Home is associated with feelings of security and consolation.

 

    As in all modern wars, the victims of the latest Middle Eastern war are mainly civilians. We have an accumulated knowledge about the children’s responses to air raids, bombardment, shelling, loss of family members and being target and witnessing killing and destruction. It involves research on acute responses during the II World war (Brander, 1941; Dunsdon, 1941; Freud & Burlingham, 1943), mental health Middle Eastern children during military attacks (Bryce & Walker,1986; Baker, 1990; Macksoud & Aber, 1996; Milgram & Milgram, 1976; Ziv & Israeli, 1973; Saigh, 1991), as well as military violence and persecution in Africa (Dawes, 1992; Cliff, 1993) and Europe (Smith, Perrin, Yule, & Rabe-Hasketh, 2001). Children’s responses to danger and life-threat include anxiety, somatization and withdrawal symptoms, and especially younger children may regress into the earlier stages of development (Yule, 2002). While almost all children respond with excessive fear, sleeping difficulties and clinging to parents in acute trauma, only a smaller minority develop posttraumatic disorders.

 

    A substantial amount of research is available on the severity of  PTSD symptoms and predictive factors among Middle Eastern children, especially of Kuwaiti children during the nine-months of  Iraqi occupation (Hadi, & Llabre, 1998; Llabre & Hadi, 1994; Macksoud & Aber, 1996; Nader, & Pynoos, 1993; Pynoos, 1994; Nader & Fairbanks, 1984) and  Israeli children during the Iraqi scud missile bombardment (Klingman, 1992; Lavee & Ben-David, 1993; Laor, Wolmer, & Cohen, 2001; Laor, Wolmer, Mayers, Gershon, Weitzman, & Cohen, 1997;  Weisenberg, Schwarzwald, Waysman, Solomon, & Klingman, 1993; Rahav & Ronen, 1994; Rosenthanl & Levy-Shiff, 1993). The percentages of PTSD diagnosis vary from 22% among Israeli (Laor et al., 1997, 27% among Lebanese (Saigh, 1991) 41% among Palestinian children from Gaza exposed to shelling, (Thabet & Vostanis, 1999) 48% among Cambodian refugee children (Kinzie, Sack, Angell, Manson, & Rath, 1996; Sack, Clarke, & Seeley, 1995), 52% among children from Bosnia-Hercegovina (Smith, Perrin, Yule, Hacam, & Stuvland, 2002), and 78-88% among Iraqi children exposed to bombardment (Dyregrov, Gjestad, & Raundalen, 1993). Longitudinal studies on the PTSD are rare, and they reveal that once the fighting and danger are over, the posttraumatic symptoms decrease considerable (Laor et al., 2001; Punamäki, Qouta, & El Sarraj, 2001). Among Kuwaiti children, the share of severe level of PTSD was 4% after one year of traumatic events, among Iraqi children and among Israeli children 0% after five years (Laor, et at. 2001). Dyregrow et al (2002) followed shelled children at six months, one year and two years, and showed first increase from 84% to 88%, and then decrease to 78% of PTSD.

 

    The physical and emotional proximity, severity and nature of the traumatic event prescribe the nature and severity of psychological problems (Macksoud & Aber, 1996; Qouta, Punamäki, & El-Sarraj, 1996; Punamaki, 1998; Pynoos, 1987; Klingman, 1992). For example, Bryce et al. (1989) found that especially displacement from home increased depression among Lebanese children and women during the 1982 Israeli invasion. Laor et al., (1997; 2001) found among Israeli children that while posttraumatic stress symptoms decreased generally after the Iraqi shelling, the symptoms increased among displaced children.

 

    The present study examines the levels of PTSD among Palestinian children during the current Intifada. We further study how the nature of trauma (personal exposure to and witnessing military violence) correlates with the children vision to their future, and we  guess that these traumatic experiences will affect the way, in which the child see his perspectives and solving problems.

 

Method

 

-          The Sample

The sample consisted of 944 children ranging between 10-19 years, randomly selected from all part of Gaza Strip with Arithmetic mean (15.1±1.5). 49.7% of the sample were boys while 50.3% were girls. Refugee children represented 76.8% of the sample and the rest were citizen’s residents. Seven field workers had participated in the field work, which done at schools, with co-operation of the teacher and headmasters,

 

-          Measurements

1. Trauma questionnaire scale:  This was developed for this study by the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme. It consists of 12 traumatic events frequently experienced by Palestinian children during the “Al-Aqsa Intifada” (Box 1). Seven events refer to direct exposure to the traumatic events (e.g., tear gas, shooting, or deprivation of medical help), while five events refer to witnessing military violence, (e.g. witnessing killing and injuring). Reliability by Alpha Cronbach  was .82  

 

Box 1. Trauma questionnaire scale

    The following are a number of questions related to difficult events that you were exposed to. It has nothing to do with a disorder or a normal event.

 

N°

Item

Yes

No

1

Was your house exposed to shelling

 

 

2

Were you exposed to inhaling tear gas

 

 

3

Were you exposed to burns

 

 

4

Were you shot by live ammunitions

 

 

5

Were you exposed to shot by rubber bullets

 

 

6

Were you shot in the hear to the degree that you lost conscious

 

 

7

Were you derivate of medical care where you need it

 

 

 

Witnessing traumatic events:

The following questions are related to events that you may have witnessed or heard about. Now I would like you to answer them.

 

N°

Item

Yes

No

1

Witnessing shooting fighting or explosion

 

 

2

Witnessing strangers being injured or killed

 

 

3

Witnessing family members, neighbours, relatives being injured or killed

 

 

4

Witnessing family members being injured or killed

 

 

5

Witnessing shelling and funerals

 

 

 

Note: the trauma scale is answered by the child not the mother

 

2. PTSD Scale (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale) (DSMIV, American Psychiatric Association, 1994). For the purposes of this study, PTSD refers to chronic and not acute PTSD since the events described by the youths were associated with lifetime trauma exposures. The scale was based the Clinician Administered PTSD published in the Journal of Traumatic Stress. The Child Posttraumatic Stress Reaction Index (CPTS-RI): this follows DSMIV criteria, developed by Nader and used to measure PTSD in youths aged 12 and over(1) Children’s PTSD-symptoms were assed by the Child Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (CPTS_RI).(2) The 20-symptom scale is used to assess the degree of a child’s reactions to a selected traumatic event, and covers the intrusive re-experiencing of the event, avoiding related memories and numbing feelings and increased hyper-arousal. The older children (13-16) reported themselves and the interviewer estimated together with younger children the occurrence of the symptoms on a five-point scale: (0) none of the time, (1) little of the time, (2) some of the time, (3) much of the time, and (4) most of the time.

 

    The maximum sum score is 80 and minimum 12, and in our sample the range was 11-68.  Averaged sum variables were constructed for intrusive (9 items, a =.80), avoidance (7 items, a =.77) and hyperarousal (4 items, a =.66) symptoms.  The CPTS_RI has been fond reliable and valid in predicting trauma impacts among Arab children in Palestine (Punamäki et al., 2001; Qouta, et al., 2001) and Kuwait (Nader et. al., 1993; Nader, & Pynoos, 1993; Hadi, & Llabre, 1998). 

 

3. Open questions. We presented a picture of “Fatima”, a 15 year old sitting by herself and looking out into empty space. We asked children to imagine what kinds of problems Fatima might be thinking of and how they, the children, could help solve them. In an effort to avoid suggestibility, the researcher provided the children with no additional information regarding “Fatima.”

 

rESULTS:

    Research on the "Prevalence of PTSD among Palestinian Child during in Gaza Strip” showed the results of the psychological suffering among Palestinian children living under severe conditions during  of Al-Aqsa Intifada in hot and community areas of the Gaza Strip. The most prevalent types of trauma exposure for children in the community areas is for those who had witnessed funerals 94.6%, witnessed shooting 83.2%, witnessed shooting, 66.9 %; saw a friend or a neighbor being injured or killed 61.6% and were tear gassed 36.1%. (see table 1).

 

TABLE 1 Prevalence rate of the traumatic experiences among children in the community areas

 

Direct Personal experience

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Shelling of the home

179

19

Tear-gassed

341

36.1

Severe burns

89

9.4

Shot by live bullets

26

2.8

Shot by plastic bullets

31

3.3

Head injury with loss of consciousness

23

2.4

Deprivation of medical help

73

7.7

Witnessing traumatic events

 

 

Saw shooting, fighting or explosion

785

83.2

Saw stranger being injured or killed

632

66.9

Saw friend or neighbor being injured or killed

584

61.6

Saw family member being injured

239

25.3

Saw funerals

893

94.6

 

 

    It was found that 32.7% of the children in the community areas suffered from acute level of PTSD while 49.2.1% children suffered from moderate level of PTSD at the same time 15.6% children suffered low level of PTSD and we can say that 2.5% children had no symptoms while in hot areas 54.6% of the children suffered from acute level of PTSD (see table 2). While 34.5% children suffered from moderate level of PTSD at the same time 9.2% children suffered low level of PTSD and we can say that 1.7% children had no symptoms.

 

 

TABLE 2 The severity of PTSD according to the child’s gender PTSD score

 

PTSD score

All (boys and girls)

%

N

None or Doubtful (<12)

2.5

24

Mild (12-24)

15.6

147

Moderate(25-39)

49.2

464

Severe (>40)

32.7

309

 

    The study found significant differences between boys and girls. In the acute level of PTSD, 57.9% girls developed such symptoms while the percentage among the boys was 42.1% (see table 3).

 

TABLE 3 The severity of PTSD according to the child’s gender PTSD score

 

PTSD score

Girls
Boys

%

N

%

N

None or Doubtful (<12)

25

6

75

18

Mild (12-24)

38.8

57

61.2

90

Moderate(25-39)

50.2

233

49.8

231

Severe (>40)

57.9